GRB 201116***A***: Swift-BAT refined analysis
 
<somebody goes first>
<add the BA alphabetically>
S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), 
J. R. Cummings (CPI),
H. A. Krimm (NSF),
S. Laha (GSFC/UMBC),
A. Y. Lien (GSFC/UMBC),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC),
D. M. Palmer (LANL),
T. Sakamoto (AGU),
M. Stamatikos (OSU),
T. N. Ukwatta (LANL)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
 
Using the data set from T-240 to T+302 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 201116***A*** (trigger #1006907)
(NAME, et al., GCN Circ. xxxx).  The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 85.727, 25.405 deg which is 
   RA(J2000)  =  05h 42m 54.4s 
   Dec(J2000) = +25d 24' 17.2" 
with an uncertainty of 2.3 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 100%.
 
[Description about the mask-weighted light curve]
T90 (15-350 keV) is 416.00 +- 64.00 sec (estimated error including systematics).
 
The time-averaged spectrum from TTBD to TTBD sec is best fit by a simple
power-law model.  The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is
3.65 +- 0.00.  The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 8.8 +- 0.0 x 10^-05 erg/cm2.
The 1-sec peak photon flux measured from T+231.60 sec in the 15-150 keV band
is 3.6 +- 0.3 ph/cm2/sec.  All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence
level. 
 
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/1006907/BA/
 
 
#####################################################################################
## Special note (please do not include this in the email circular):
## Becuase E0 = 13.0128 is outside of the BAT energy range (15-350 keV),
## A simple power-law model is chosen despite delta chi2 > 6.
#####################################################################################