GRB 210820***A***, Swift-BAT refined analysis S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), H. A. Krimm (NSF), S. Laha (GSFC/UMBC), A. Y. Lien (U Tampa), C. B. Markwardt (GSFC), D. M. Palmer (LANL), T. Parsotan (GSFC/UMBC), T. Sakamoto (AGU), M. Stamatikos (OSU) (i.e. the Swift-BAT team): Using the data set from T-239 to T+963 sec from the recent telemetry downlink, we report further analysis of BAT GRB 210820***A*** (trigger #1069551) (NAME, et al., GCN Circ. xxxx). The BAT ground-calculated position is RA, Dec = 20.625, 4.647 deg which is RA(J2000) = 01h 22m 30.0s Dec(J2000) = +04d 38' 48.5" with an uncertainty of 3.5 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment). The partial coding was 48%. [Description about the mask-weighted light curve] T90 (15-350 keV) is 151.7 +- 20.6 sec (estimated error including systematics). The time-averaged spectrum from T+0.8 to T+160.2 sec is best fit by a simple power-law model. The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is 2.10 +- 0.22. The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 1.3 +- 0.2 x 10^-06 erg/cm2. The 1-sec peak photon flux measured from T+10.92 sec in the 15-150 keV band is 0.8 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec. All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence level. The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/1069551/BA/ ##################################################################################### ## Special note (please do not include this in the email circular): ## Becuase E0 = 13.1618 is outside of the BAT energy range (15-350 keV), ## A simple power-law model is chosen despite delta chi2 > 6. #####################################################################################