GRB 210903***A***: Swift-BAT refined analysis
 
<somebody goes first>
<add the BA alphabetically>
S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), 
H. A. Krimm (NSF),
S. Laha (GSFC/UMBC),
A. Y. Lien (U Tampa),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC),
D. M. Palmer (LANL),
T. Sakamoto (AGU),
M. Stamatikos (OSU)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
 
Using the data set from T-120 to T+363 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 210903***A*** (trigger #1071762)
(NAME, et al., GCN Circ. xxxx).  The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 135.475, -40.296 deg which is 
   RA(J2000)  =  09h 01m 54.1s 
   Dec(J2000) = -40d 17' 47.3" 
with an uncertainty of 2.8 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 96%.
 
[Description about the mask-weighted light curve]
T90 (15-350 keV) is 80.00 +- 35.78 sec (estimated error including systematics).
 
The time-averaged spectrum from T-67.00 to T+29.00 sec is best fit by a simple
power-law model.  The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is
2.64 +- 0.22.  The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 9.2 +- 1.2 x 10^-07 erg/cm2.
The 1-sec peak photon flux measured from T+4.50 sec in the 15-150 keV band
is 0.3 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec.  All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence
level. 
 
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/1071762/BA/
 
 
#####################################################################################
## Special note (please do not include this in the email circular):
## Becuase E0 = 6.49351 is outside of the BAT energy range (15-350 keV),
## A simple power-law model is chosen despite delta chi2 > 6.
#####################################################################################