GRB 260101***A***, Swift-BAT refined analysis
 
<somebody goes first>
<add the BA alphabetically>
S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), 
R. Gupta (GSFC),
H. A. Krimm (NSF),
S. Laha (GSFC/UMBC),
A. Y. Lien (U Tampa),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC),
M. J. Moss (GSFC),
D. M. Palmer (LANL),
T. Parsotan (GSFC),
D. Sadaula (GSFC/UMBC),
T. Sakamoto (AGU)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
 
Using the data set from T-239 to T+1066 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 260101***A*** (trigger #1429608)
(NAME, et al., GCN Circ. xxxx).  The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 86.442, 63.583 deg which is 
   RA(J2000)  =  05h 45m 46.2s 
   Dec(J2000) = +63d 34' 57.2" 
with an uncertainty of 1.1 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 78%.
 
[Description about the mask-weighted light curve]
T90 (15-350 keV) is 48.0 +- 16.0 sec (estimated error including systematics).
 
The time-averaged spectrum from T-31.3 to T+64.7 sec is best fit by a power law
with an exponential cutoff.  This fit gives a photon index 1.28 +- 0.23, 
and Epeak of 111.2 +- 68.6 keV (chi squared 55.19 for 56 d.o.f.).  For this
model the total fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 4.4 +- 0.2 x 10^-06 erg/cm2
and the 1-sec peak flux measured from T+24.24 sec in the 15-150 keV band is
4.5 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec.  A fit to a simple power law gives a photon index
of 1.61 +- 0.06 (chi squared 61.90 for 57 d.o.f.).  All the quoted errors
are at the 90% confidence level. 
 
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/1429608/BA/