GRB 140211***A***: Swift-BAT refined analysis
 
<somebody goes first>
<add the BA alphabetically>
S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), 
W. H. Baumgartner (GSFC/UMBC),
J. R. Cummings (GSFC/UMBC),
N. Gehrels (GSFC),
H. A. Krimm (GSFC/USRA),
A. Y. Lien (NASA/UMBC),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC),
D. M. Palmer (LANL),
T. Sakamoto (AGU),
M. Stamatikos (OSU),
J. Tueller (GSFC),
T. N. Ukwatta (MSU)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
 
Using the data set from T-240 to T+962 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 140211***A*** (trigger #586363)
(NAME, et al., GCN Circ. xxxx).  The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 266.051, -28.685 deg which is 
   RA(J2000)  =  17h 44m 12.3s 
   Dec(J2000) = -28d 41' 05.6" 
with an uncertainty of 7.1 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 94%.
 
[Description about the mask-weighted light curve]
T90 (15-350 keV) is 777.00 +- 801.36 sec (estimated error including systematics).
 
The time-averaged spectrum from TTBD to TTBD sec is best fit by a power law
with an exponential cutoff.  This fit gives a photon index 1.00 +- 0.00, 
and Epeak of 50.0 +- 0.0 keV (chi squared 282.32 for 56 d.o.f.).  For this
model the total fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 3.4 +- 0.3 x 10^-06 erg/cm2
and the 1-sec peak flux measured from T+0.26 sec in the 15-150 keV band is
1.0 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec.  A fit to a simple power law gives a photon index
of 0.00 +- 0.00 (chi squared 0.00 for 0 d.o.f.).  All the quoted errors
are at the 90% confidence level. 
 
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/586363/BA/