GRB 140622***A***, Swift-BAT refined analysis
 
<somebody goes first>
<add the BA alphabetically>
S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), 
W. H. Baumgartner (GSFC/UMBC),
J. R. Cummings (GSFC/UMBC),
N. Gehrels (GSFC),
H. A. Krimm (GSFC/USRA),
A. Y. Lien (GSFC/UMBC),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC),
D. M. Palmer (LANL),
T. Sakamoto (AGU),
M. Stamatikos (OSU),
T. N. Ukwatta (LANL)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
 
Using the data set from T-61 to T+302 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 140622***A*** (trigger #602278)
(NAME, et al., GCN Circ. xxxx).  The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 317.153, -14.412 deg which is 
   RA(J2000)  =  21h 08m 36.7s 
   Dec(J2000) = -14d 24' 44.4" 
with an uncertainty of 2.5 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 57%.
 
[Description about the mask-weighted light curve]
T90 (15-350 keV) is 0.1 +- 0.0 sec (estimated error including systematics).
 
The time-averaged spectrum from T-0.0 to T+0.1 sec is best fit by a simple
power-law model.  The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is
3.08 +- 0.29.  The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 1.3 +- 0.4 x 10^-08 erg/cm2.
The 1-sec peak photon flux measured from T-0.45 sec in the 15-150 keV band
is 0.6 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec.  All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence
level. 
 
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/602278/BA/
 
 
############################################################################################
## Special note (please do not include this in the email circular):
## Because this is a particularly short burst (T90 < 1 sec), only the simple power-law fit
## and special SGR fit (if the burst is within 2 deg of the Galactic plane) are considered.
## That is, the cutoff power-law fit is not one of the options despite the low chi2 value.
############################################################################################