GRB 200411***A***, Swift-BAT refined analysis
 
<somebody goes first>
<add the BA alphabetically>
S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), 
J. R. Cummings (CPI),
H. A. Krimm (NSF),
S. Laha (GSFC/UMBC),
A. Y. Lien (GSFC/UMBC),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC),
D. M. Palmer (LANL),
T. Sakamoto (AGU),
M. Stamatikos (OSU),
T. N. Ukwatta (LANL)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
 
Using the data set from T-239 to T+963 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 200411***A*** (trigger #965784)
(NAME, et al., GCN Circ. xxxx).  The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 47.686, -52.320 deg which is 
   RA(J2000)  =  03h 10m 44.7s 
   Dec(J2000) = -52d 19' 13.5" 
with an uncertainty of 1.6 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 100%.
 
[Description about the mask-weighted light curve]
T90 (15-350 keV) is 0.2 +- 0.0 sec (estimated error including systematics).
 
The time-averaged spectrum from T-0.0 to T+0.2 sec is best fit by a simple
power-law model.  The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is
0.95 +- 0.19.  The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 8.6 +- 1.1 x 10^-08 erg/cm2.
The 1-sec peak photon flux measured from T-0.38 sec in the 15-150 keV band
is 1.1 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec.  All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence
level. 
 
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/965784/BA/