Swift Observations of GRB 221024A

R. Brivio (INAF-OAB), M. Capalbi (INAF-IASFPA) and N.P.M. Kuin () for the Swift team

1. Introduction

At 13:00:27 UT, the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) triggered and located GRB 221024A (trigger=1131029) (Brivio et al. GCN Circ. 32827). Swift slewed immediately to the burst. At the time of the trigger, the initial BAT position was 58° from the Sun (2.6 hours West) and 47° from the 1%-illuminated Moon. Table 1 contains the best reported positions from Swift, and the latest XRT position can be viewed at http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_positions.

Swain et al. (GCN Circ. 32841) reported the position from GROWTH-India Tel. for the optical afterglow of this GRB. Table 2 is a summary of GCN Circulars about this GRB from observatories other than Swift.

Standard analysis products for this burst are available at https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/swift_gnd_ana.html.

2. BAT Observations and Analysis

As reported by Lien et al. (GCN Circ. 32854), the BAT ground-calculated position is RA, Dec = 169.702, 33.068 deg which is RA(J2000) = 11h18m48.6s Dec(J2000) = +33°04'04.9" with an uncertainty of 2.9 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment). The partial coding was 35%.

The mask-weighted light curve (Figure 1) shows a rather weak pulse starting at the trigger time, peaking around T+5 seconds and decaying to baseline by about T+40 seconds. There is some low-level emission following this peak, including a possible peak In the low-energy bands at approximately T+200 seconds. The pipeline-calculated T90 (15-350 keV) is 120± 111 s (estimated error including systematics), with the large stated error due to uncertainty in whether the possible T+200 peak contains at least 5% of the burst fluence.

The time-averaged spectrum from T+0.00 to T+221.28 s is best fit by a simple power-law model. The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is 1.39 ± 0.25. The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 1.5 ± 0.2 x 10-6 erg cm-2. The 1-s peak photon flux measured from T+2.93 s in the 15-150 keV band is 1.5 ± 0.3 ph cm-2 s-1. This fluence is larger than that of 52% of the long GRBs in the Second BAT GRB Catalog (Sakamoto et al. 2011). All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence level.

The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/1131029/BA/.

3. XRT Observations and Analysis

Analysis of the initial XRT data was reported by Capalbi et al. (GCN Circ. 32846). We have analysed 19 ks of XRT data for GRB 221024A, from 114 s to 236.3 ks after the BAT trigger. The data comprise 248 s in Windowed Timing (WT) mode (the first 8 s were taken while Swift was slewing) with the remainder in Photon Counting (PC) mode. The enhanced XRT position for this burst was given by Osborne et al. (GCN Circ. 32839).

The late-time light curve (Figure 2) (from T0+11.3 ks) can be modelled with a power-law decay with a decay index of α=1.87 ± 0.10.

A spectrum formed from the WT mode data can be fitted with an absorbed power-law with a photon spectral index of 1.53 ± 0.04. The best-fitting absorption column is 5.4 ± 1.1 x 1020 cm-2, in excess of the Galactic value of 2.9 x 1020 cm-2 (Willingale et al. 2013). The PC mode spectrum has a photon index of 1.96 (+0.14, -0.13) and a best-fitting absorption column of 6.0 (+3.2, -2.9) x 1020 cm-2. The counts to observed (unabsorbed) 0.3-10 keV flux conversion factor deduced from this spectrum is 3.3 x 10-11 (3.7 x 10-11) erg cm-2 count-1.

A summary of the PC-mode spectrum is thus:
Total column: 6.0 (+3.2, -2.9) x 1020 cm-2
Galactic foreground: 2.9 x 1020 cm-2
Excess significance: 1.7 σ
Photon index: 1.96 (+0.14, -0.13)

The results of the XRT team automatic analysis are available at http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/01131029.

4. UVOT Observations and Analysis

The Swift/UVOT began settled observations of the field of GRB221024A 127 seconds after the BAT trigger (Kuin GCN Circ. 32848). The UVOT could not observe in the u,b,v or white filters due to the nearby bright star nu uMa (V=3.49, U=6.44). Table 3 gives preliminary magnitudes using the UVOT photometric system (Breeveld et al. 2011, AIP Conf. Proc., 1358, 373). No correction has been made for the expected extinction in the Milky Way corresponding to a reddening of EB-V of 0.05 mag. in the direction of the GRB (Schlegel et al. 1998).

BAT light curve

Figure 1. The BAT mask-weighted light curve in the four individual and total energy bands. The units are counts s-1 illuminated-detector-1. The vertical green dash-dotted lines show the T50 interval, the vertical black dashed lines show the T90 interval, and vertical blue (orange) solid lines show the start (stop) of slews.

XRT light curve

Figure 2. The XRT light curve. Any data from a crosshatched region are not included in the fit.

RA (J2000) Dec (J2000) Error Note Reference
11h18m57.75s +33°02'31.2" 2.6" XRT-final UKSSDC
11h18m57.75s +33°02'31.2" 2.6" XRT-enhanced Osborne et al. GCN Circ. 32839
11h18m48.6s +33°04'04.9" 2.9' BAT-refined Lien et al. GCN Circ. 32854

Table 1. Positions from the Swift instruments.

Band Authors GCN Circ. Subject Observatory Notes
Optical Strobl et al. 32838 D50 candidate afterglow D50 detection
Optical Swain et al. 32841 GIT confirmation of the optical
afterglow
GROWTH-India Tel. detection
Optical Andrade et al. 32859 GRANDMA observations GRANDMA
Optical Belkin et al. 32863 Mondy optical observations Mondy detection

Table 2. Summary of GCN Circulars from other observatories sorted by band and then circular number.

Table 3. Found no UVOT observations.

October 28, 2022