M.J. Moss (GWU), A. D'Ai (INAF-IASFPA) and M.H. Siegel (PSU) for the Swift team
At 12:06:46 UT, the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) triggered and located GRB 200922A (trigger=997024) (Moss et al. GCN Circ. 28471). Swift slewed immediately to the burst. At the time of the trigger, the initial BAT position was 105° from the Sun (7.8 hours East) and 50° from the 33%-illuminated Moon. Table 1 contains the best reported positions from Swift, and the latest XRT position can be viewed at http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_positions.
Moss et al. (GCN Circ. 28471) reported the discovery with UVOT of an optical afterglow. Izzo et al. (GCN Circ. 28478) reported the position from LCO for the optical afterglow of this GRB. Table 2 is a summary of GCN Circulars about this GRB from observatories other than Swift.
Standard analysis products for this burst are available at https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/swift_gnd_ana.html.
As reported by Sakamoto et al. (GCN Circ. 28484),
the BAT ground-calculated position is RA, Dec = 296.954, -55.199 deg which is RA(J2000) = 1
The mask-weighted light curve (Figure 1) shows a single FRED-like pulse that starts at ~T-2 s, peaks at ~T+0, and ends at ~T+16 s.
The time-averaged spectrum from T-1.91 to T+16.22 s is best fit by a power law with an exponential cutoff.
This fit gives a photon index 1.43 ± 0.26, and
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at https://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/997024/BA/.
Analysis of the initial XRT data was reported by D'Ai et al. (GCN Circ. 28476). We have analysed 26 ks of XRT data for GRB 200922A, from 81 s to 354.9 ks after the BAT trigger. The data comprise 123 s in Windowed Timing (WT) mode with the remainder in Photon Counting (PC) mode. The enhanced XRT position for this burst was given by Osborne et al. (GCN Circ. 28473).
The light curve (Figure 2) can be modelled with a power-law decay with a decay index of α=1.150 (+0.023, -0.022).
A spectrum formed from the WT mode data can be fitted with an absorbed power-law with a photon spectral index of 2.33 (+0.18, -0.17). The best-fitting absorption column is 1.6 (+0.5, -0.4) x 1
A summary of the PC-mode spectrum is thus:
Total column: 2.5 (+0.9, -0.8) x 1
Galactic foreground: 4.7 x 1
Excess significance: 4.4 σ
Photon index: 2.21 (+0.24, -0.23)
The results of the XRT team automatic analysis are available at http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/00997024.
The Swift/UVOT began settled observations of the field of GRB 200922A 86 s after the BAT trigger
(Siegel and Moss GCN Circ. 28482).
We identify a fading source near the XRT position (Osborne et al. GCN Circ. 28473) and also at the location of a weak source in the DSS.
Table 3 gives preliminary
magnitudes using the UVOT photometric system
(Breeveld et al. 2011, AIP Conf. Proc., 1358, 373).
No correction has been made for the expected extinction in the Milky Way
corresponding to a reddening of
Figure 1. The BAT
mask-weighted light curve in the four individual and total
energy bands. The units are counts
Figure 2. The XRT light curve.
Any data from a crosshatched region are not included in the fit.
RA (J2000) | Dec (J2000) | Error | Note | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
-55°12'16.5" | 0.5" | UVOT | GCN Circ. 28482 |
1 |
-55°12'15.9" | 1.5" | XRT-final | UKSSDC |
1 |
-55°12'15.9" | 1.5" | XRT-enhanced | Evans et al. GCN Circ. 28483 |
1 |
-55°11'55.1" | 1.0' | BAT-refined | Sakamoto et al. GCN Circ. 28484 |
Band | Authors | GCN Circ. | Subject | Observatory | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Optical | Lipunov et al. | 28477 | Swift GRB 200922A: Global MASTER-Net observations report |
MASTER | |
Optical | Izzo et al. | 28478 | LCO observations | LCO | |
Optical | Malesani et al. | 28492 | chance superposition between optical afterglow and archival star |
light curve | |
Optical | Pozanenko et al. | 28505 | Chilescope optical observations | ||
Gamma-ray | Zhang et al. | 28490 | Insight-HXMT/HE detection | Insight-HXMT |
Filter | Exp(s) | Mag | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
white | 86 | 236 | 147 | 14.37±0.02 |
white | 4770 | 4970 | 196 | 17.51±0.04 |
white | 28889 | 28909 | 19 | 18.62±0.20 |
v | 3745 | 3945 | 196 | 17.35±0.10 |
v | 9268 | 23149 | 1460 | 17.79±0.05 |
b | 4566 | 4765 | 196 | 17.95±0.07 |
b | 27982 | 28889 | 881 | 18.49±0.05 |
u | 4360 | 4560 | 196 | 17.18±0.06 |
u | 15921 | 16791 | 848 | 18.20±0.06 |
uvw1 | 4156 | 4355 | 196 | 17.23±0.10 |
uvw1 | 11089 | 15915 | 887 | 18.26±0.09 |
uvw1 | 50455 | 56029 | 225 | 18.97±0.27 |
uvm2 | 3950 | 4150 | 196 | 17.12±0.12 |
uvm2 | 10182 | 11081 | 885 | 18.19±0.10 |
uvm2 | 50396 | 55850 | 223 | 19.26±0.36 |
uvw2 | 3541 | 5089 | 307 | 17.14±0.09 |
uvw2 | 21653 | 22553 | 885 | 18.77±0.12 |
uvw2 | 50338 | 55672 | 223 | >19.44 |
Table 3. UVOT observations reported by Siegel and Moss (GCN Circ. 28482). The start and stop times of the exposures are given in seconds since the BAT trigger. The preliminary detections and 3-σ upper limits are given. No correction has been made for extinction in the Milky Way.
September 27, 2020