Return to: UVOT Digest
The exposure time keywords were incorrect for about 2% of the UVOT image data taken in 2005 March through 2005 September. Some earlier exposures are also likely to have problems. In some (but not all) of the cases the problem is caused by an error in the shift-and-add software in the instrument. This text file provides a list of these exposures and the correction factor needed for the exposure length. This problem is corrected in the current version (December 2005) of the Swift pipeline processing software. Exposure time keywords for the affected images will be fixed once the data is reprocessed with the current pipeline software.
For data processed with earlier versions of the pipeline, the reported exposures lengths may be incorrect. The problem can be corrected by following the recipe below.
Example:
Let's fix the fourth extension in
sw00131560001uvv_sk.imgwhose measured to expected count ratio is shown in the list of affected images as 0.0732:
# MET File Name Exposure Expected Actual Ratio # Counts Counts 139512177 sw00131560001uvv_rw.img vv139512177I 36006149 2635110 0.0732
EXPOSURE= 1500.44392000555 / Total exposure, with all known correction
Create an ASCII file called newtime with the original exposure time corrected for the ratio of true counts in the image to expected counts:
EXPOSURE= 109.832 / Total exposure, corrected for aspect errorRun the tool fmodhead to insert the new value into the file in the appropriate extension:
fmodhead sw00131560001uvv_sk.img+4 newtime
Once the exposure time has been corrected in this way, standard tools that calculate magnitude based on measured counts over the elapsed exposure time (such as uvotmag) will return the correct answer.
Return to: UVOT Digest